<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>clog: Tag Science</title>
    <link>http://blog.chrispcritter.com/articles/tag/science</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description></description>
    <item>
      <title>5 'til Midnight</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doomsday_clock"&gt;Doomsday Clock&lt;/a&gt; was &lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/01/17/doomsday.clock.ap/index.html"&gt;updated&lt;/a&gt; today due to increased risk of nuclear war and a perceived degradation in the global climate.  Climate change is a recent addition to the criteria for the clock.  This adds a great deal of scientific credibility to the concept of climate change.  I hope this raises awareness that this is a real problem.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There is constant debate regarding climate change.  I find most people to be very misinformed about it, unfortunately.  Most recent research points to climate change happening, but not as a &amp;#8221;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_Effect#Positive_feedback_and_runaway_greenhouse_effect"&gt;runaway greenhouse effect&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;#8221;  Rather than seeing exponential increases in CO2 and temperatures, they both seem to be reaching a limit.  That means they reach a certain saturation point more and more slowly.  This is caused by several feedback mechanisms present in our environment.   For example,  the process of melting ice sheets actually &lt;a href="http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/mg19325854.400"&gt;soaks up CO2&lt;/a&gt;, which slows down the rate of overall CO2 increase.  There are many other examples of this type of behavior.  Fortunately, we&amp;#8217;re probably still a ways off from the &amp;#8220;point of no return.&amp;#8221;  These mechanisms will eventually break though, and I hope that people can understand the gravity of how important it is to take care of our environment before that happens.   Most scientists are in agreement that this is a critical issue.  The fact that it was added to the Doomsday Clock&amp;#8217;s criteria underscores this.  It means that there are now two critical issues that scientists generally feel are imperative to the survival of the human race, nuclear war and climate change.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;ANYTHING we do to help fix this problem is worthwhile, whether it&amp;#8217;s biased or not.  The UN and nations that provide global leadership should be upheld to the expectation of providing leadership for both of these issues.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:13:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:53e8ee96-d40c-4688-a14d-ff1f62d7529a</guid>
      <author>chrisp</author>
      <link>http://blog.chrispcritter.com/articles/2007/01/18/5-til-midnight</link>
      <category>The Chrispy Life</category>
      <category>ClimateChange</category>
      <category>GlobalWarming</category>
      <category>Science</category>
      <category>Politics</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
